labvanced logoLabVanced
  • Research
    • Publications
    • Researcher Interviews
    • Use Cases
      • Developmental Psychology
      • Linguistics
      • Clinical & Digital Health
      • Educational Psychology
      • Cognitive & Neuro
      • Social & Personality
      • Arts Research
      • Sports & Movement
      • Marketing & Consumer Behavior
      • Economics
      • HCI / UX
      • Commercial / Industry Use
    • Labvanced Blog
    • Services
  • Technology
    • Feature Overview
    • Code-Free Study Building
    • Eye Tracking
    • Mouse Tracking
    • Generative AI Integration
    • Multi User Studies
    • More ...
      • Reaction Time/Precise Timing
      • Text Transcription
      • Heart Rate Detection (rPPG)
      • Emotion Detection
      • Questionnaires/Surveys
      • Experimental Control
      • Data Privacy & Security
      • Desktop App
      • Mobile App
  • Learn
    • Guide
    • Videos
    • Walkthroughs
    • FAQ
    • Release Notes
    • Documents
    • Classroom
  • Experiments
    • Cognitive Tests
    • Sample Studies
    • Public Experiment Library
  • Pricing
    • Licenses
    • Top-Up Recordings
    • Subject Recruitment
    • Study Building
    • Dedicated Support
    • Checkout
  • About
    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Downloads
    • Careers
    • Impressum
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy & Security
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Third-Party Licenses
  • Appgo to app icon
  • Logingo to app icon
Research
Publications
Tasks
Researcher Interviews
Use Cases
Labvanced Blog
Services
  • 中國人
  • Deutsch
  • Français
  • Español
  • English
  • 日本語
Publications
Tasks
Researcher Interviews
Use Cases
Labvanced Blog
Services
  • 中國人
  • Deutsch
  • Français
  • Español
  • English
  • 日本語
  • Publications
  • Tasks
  • Researcher Interviews
    • Comparing Online Webcam- and Laboratory-Based Eye-Tracking for the Assessment of Infant Audio-Visual Synchrony Perception
    • Finding Goldilocks Influencers- How Follower Count Drives Social Media Engagement
    • The semantic interference in 9- to 36-month old infants: An at-home eye-tracking study on infants' lexical abilities
    • Song Is More Memorable Than Speech Prosody - Discrete Pitches Aid Auditory Working Memory
    • Orthographic Relatedness and Transposed-word Effects in the Grammatical Decision Task
    • Emotion Modulation through Music after Sadness Induction
    • Children Learning Non-Adjacent Dependencies
    • Personality Hear in Noise
    • Are All Eyes the Same?
    • Verbal Priming in Infants
  • Use Cases
    • Research Areas

      • Developmental Psychology
      • Linguistics
      • Clinical & Digital Health
      • Educational Psychology
      • Cognitive & Neuro
      • Social & Personality Psychology
      • Arts, Music & Digital Media
      • Sports & Movement Psychology
      • Marketing & Consumer Behavior
      • Economics
      • HCI / UX
      • Commercial / Industry Use
    • Researchers

      • Students
      • Researchers
      • Groups
  • Blog
    • Generative AI in Educational Psychology Research
    • Best Practices for Webcam Eye Tracking Research with Infants and Toddlers
    • Types of Stimuli in Delay Discounting Tasks
    • Delay Discounting Task
    • Mindfulness-based Self-Efficacy Scale - Revised (MSES-R)
    • Team Dynamics and Research
    • Stroop Task | History, Task Description, Data and Psychology
    • BKB Sentence Test | Procedure & Research
    • Dyadic Effect in Psychology | Overview & Research
    • Navon Task: Task Setup, Research & More
    • Peer-reviewed Webcam Eye Tracking
    • Corsi Block-Tapping Test: From cubes to online design
    • Dot-Probe Task | Full Guide
    • Types of Memory: Concepts to Research
    • Ultimatum Game
    • The Visual Search Task
    • Attention Tasks in Psychology Research
    • Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7)
    • Decision Making Tasks in Psychology
    • The Obsessive Compulsive Inventory – Revised (OCI-R)
    • Assessing Executive Function Skills | Tasks & Batteries
    • The Flourishing Scale (FS) Questionnaire
    • Labvanced and the Spirit of Open Science
    • The Psychology of the Incubation Effect
    • The Bouba-Kiki Effect and Task
    • Lexical Decision Task: Accessing the Mental Lexicon
    • Image Description Task and Game with a Chatbox
    • Smooth Data Collection Process | 6 Tips for Research
    • Music Research with Labvanced
    • 7 Classic Cognitive Tasks & Examples
    • Mental Rotation Test | A Spatial Processing Task
    • XY Coordinates in Labvanced
    • 5 Famous Social Psychology Experiments
    • The Power of Remote & Infant-friendly ET
    • The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
    • 13 Head Tracking Use Cases for Research
    • 5 Tips for Improving Your Perception Skills
    • Introduction to the Preferential Looking Paradigm
    • Researching Cognition in Migraine & Headache Patients
    • The Landing Page - More Info Than You Think!
    • Headphone Checks - Then and Now
    • Sample Studies - Helpful Templates and Demos!
    • What Is Neuroplasticity?
    • 15 Famous Developmental Theories
    • Visual Attention and Eye Tracking
    • What Is Eye Tracking Technology?
    • Eye Tracking in Applied Linguistics Research
    • 10 Popular Linguistic Experiments
    • The Placebo Effect
    • 6 Key Concepts of Experimental Design
    • Conditioned Play Audiometry
    • Ebbinghaus Illusion
  • Services
    • Overview
    • Joint Grant Applications
    • Subject Recruitment
    • Study Building
    • Dedicated Support
    • License Comparison
Corsi Block Tapping Test trial preview implemented in Labvanced, showing nine irregularly arranged blocks on screen.

Corsi Block Tapping Test

The Corsi Block Tapping Test is a classic neuropsychological paradigm that measures visuospatial working memory span. Participants observe a sequence of blocks lighting up one at a time and must reproduce the sequence by clicking the blocks in the exact order they appeared. Span length increases progressively until the participant's memory limit is reached.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

  • Task Format
  • Data Collected
  • Technology
  • Customization
  • Recommended Use

Task Structure of the Corsi Block Tapping Test

Nine blocks are arranged in an irregular spatial layout on screen, each assigned a fixed position. At the start of each trial, a fixation cross appears briefly, followed by the sequence display phase in which blocks light up one at a time in a predetermined order. Each block highlights for 500 ms and then dims before the next block in the sequence activates. Once the full sequence has been shown, participants are prompted to click the blocks in the same order. Span length begins at 2 and increases progressively from 2 to 9 blocks, with 2 trials per span level, for a total of 16 trials. Following Kessels et al. (2000), at least one trial per span level must be completed correctly in order for the task to advance to the next span length; if this threshold is not met, the task ends and results are displayed.


Test it out!

Desktop Version

In the desktop version, participants use a standard mouse to click on blocks. After observing the sequence, participants click the blocks in the order they were lit. Once all selections have been made, participants press the S key to submit their response and advance to the next trial. The task proceeds automatically based on whether the minimum span threshold was met.


Mobile Version

The mobile version is fully optimized for touchscreen use. The spatial block layout is identical to the desktop version. Participants tap each block to register their selections and then tap the Submit button to record their response. The interface is sized for reliable touch detection across different screen sizes and orientations, and both portrait and landscape modes are supported.

Data Collected with the Corsi Block Tapping Test

The Corsi Block Tapping Test captures a range of behavioral measurements that reveal the capacity and precision of visuospatial working memory. The variables recorded help researchers measure response accuracy, memory span, error patterns, and response latency across progressively longer sequences. All variables can be viewed and customized within the task's Variables Tab.

Variable NameDescription
ResponseArray of block IDs clicked by the participant, representing the recalled sequence in order
CorrectnessCategorical outcome of the trial: "Correct" if the full sequence was recalled accurately, "Wrong" otherwise
Response_AccuracyBinary accuracy score per trial: 1 = sequence recalled correctly, 0 = sequence recalled incorrectly
Reaction TimeTime in milliseconds from the start of the response phase to the participant's submission
Length of SequenceNumber of blocks in the target sequence for the current trial (span level)
Span Length AccomplishedThe highest span length successfully completed by the participant across all trials
Total_ScorePerformance score calculated as Span Length Accomplished × Correct Total, following Kessels et al. (2000)
Correct TotalCumulative number of trials answered correctly across the session
Errors TotalCumulative number of incorrect trials across the session

Data preview of behavioral measures and responses collected using the Corsi Block Tapping Test template, showing span levels, sequences, accuracy, and reaction times.
Preview of data recorded during from a Corsi Block Tapping Task session in Labvanced.


Corsi Block Tapping Test

This study measures visuospatial working memory span using the Corsi Block Tapping Test. Participants observe a sequence of blocks lighting up on screen and reproduce the order by clicking. Span level, accuracy, and reaction time are recorded as primary performance indicators.



Technologies Supporting the Corsi Block Tapping Test

Labvanced provides a precise and flexible environment for running the Corsi Block Tapping Test in online and in-lab settings. Several platform capabilities are particularly well suited to this task:

  • Millisecond Timing Precision: Accurate control over block flash duration and inter-stimulus intervals is critical for the Corsi paradigm. Labvanced's timing engine ensures each block lights up and dims with consistent precision, and records response latency to the millisecond.

  • Touchscreen and Desktop Support: The task includes two purpose-built versions — one optimized for mouse-based desktop interaction and one for touchscreen devices — so researchers can collect data from a wide range of participants without adapting the design manually.

  • Desktop App for In-Lab Studies: The Corsi Block Tapping Test can be run through the Labvanced Desktop App in controlled lab environments. The app supports integration with EEG systems and other LSL-compatible hardware, enabling synchronized behavioral and physiological data collection.

  • Adaptive Task Logic: The built-in progression system automatically adjusts which span level is presented and whether the task should continue or terminate, based on each participant's performance — no manual reconfiguration is needed between participants.

A person looking at a webcam eye tracking task created with Labvanced during a Corsi Block Tapping Test

Webcam Eye Tracking

Capture gaze patterns and visual attention with built-in, code-free and peer-reviewed webcam eye-tracking.

An icon of a clock symbolizing accurate reaction times from this Corsi Block Tapping Test template

Timing Precision

Capture reaction times, task performance, and more with millisecond accuracy for time-sensitive tasks.

An image of the desktop app of Labvanced used to run the Corsi Block Tapping Test template in lab

Desktop App

Run in-lab studies using the Desktop App, compatible with EEG and other LSL-connected lab hardware.

Human review list: make sure the anchors work in the table of contents update with correct images (header, data) read through all content make sure there is no false infomration, specifically: under task format - desktop and/or mobile version are correctly described cross reference variables listed with the variables tab of the study Technologies listed make sense

Customizing the Corsi Block Tapping Test Template

There are many ways to go about customizing this template. Below are a few themes researchers commonly ask when it comes to modifying this task.

Sequence Timing and Flash Duration

The duration for which each block remains highlighted and the interval between flashes are controlled by timed event actions within the Sequence Display frame. You can adjust the on-time (currently 500 ms) and the inter-stimulus gap (currently 1000 ms) by editing the Delayed Action (Time Callback) values in the Light Square and Dim Square events. Shortening these intervals increases task difficulty; lengthening them gives participants more encoding time.


Span Range and Number of Trials per Level

The template currently runs span levels 2 through 9 with 2 trials per level. You can extend or shorten this range by adding or removing conditions in the Trials & Conditions panel of the main task loop. The number of trials per span level is set by adjusting how many trial rows are assigned to each condition group, and the target sequences are stored in the Sequence_Info data frame variable, where you can edit or add sequences directly.


Progression Criteria

The task uses the minimum span threshold from Kessels et al. (2000): participants must answer at least one trial correctly per span level to advance. This logic is encoded in the Minimum Span Threshold variable and the conditional check in the Correctness Check event. If you want to apply stricter or more lenient criteria — for example, requiring both trials per level to be correct — you can adjust the comparison logic within that event's conditional actions.


Block Layout and Appearance

The nine blocks are placed at fixed positions in an irregular spatial arrangement that mirrors the classic Corsi board. Their positions can be moved by adjusting X and Y values in the object properties for each block element. Background color, block size, and highlight color (currently #78c3d8) can also be changed in the Object Properties panel or within the Light Square event action that sets the background color on activation.


If there is something else you'd like to know, please feel welcome to write to us and ask:


Contact Us

Recommended Use and Applications of the Corsi Block Tapping Test

The Corsi Block Tapping Test is one of the most widely administered measures of visuospatial working memory and short-term memory span in both research and clinical settings.

  • Cognitive Aging and Lifespan Research: Used to track age-related changes in visuospatial working memory from childhood through late adulthood, often alongside verbal span tasks to assess domain-specific memory trajectories.

  • Clinical Neuropsychological Assessment: Routinely administered to individuals with Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, stroke, and traumatic brain injury as a sensitive index of spatial memory deficits and treatment response.

  • Developmental and Pediatric Research: Applied in child development research to characterize the growth of working memory capacity across school age years, and in studies of neurodevelopmental conditions including ADHD and dyslexia.

  • Schizophrenia and Psychiatric Populations: Frequently used to document visuospatial memory deficits in schizophrenia and related conditions, providing a non-verbal complement to verbal span measures in cognitive battery assessments.

  • Rehabilitation and Intervention Studies: Employed as an outcome measure in cognitive rehabilitation programs to evaluate whether training, pharmacological, or non-invasive brain stimulation interventions improve working memory span.

  • Comparative Cross-modal Memory Research: Often paired with digit span tasks to compare verbal and visuospatial memory capacities within the same participants, helping researchers investigate the separability of working memory subsystems.


Sign Up


References

  • Corsi, P. M. (1972). Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain. Dissertation Abstracts International, 34, 819B.

  • Kessels, R. P., Van Zandvoort, M. J., Postma, A., Kappelle, L. J., & De Haan, E. H. (2000). The Corsi block-tapping task: Standardization and normative data. Applied Neuropsychology, 7(4), 252–258. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324826AN0704_8

  • Arce, T., & McMullen, K. (2021). The Corsi Block-Tapping Task: Evaluating methodological practices with an eye towards modern digital frameworks. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 4, 100099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100099