labvanced logoLabVanced
  • Research
    • Publications
    • Researcher Interviews
    • Use Cases
      • Developmental Psychology
      • Linguistics
      • Clinical & Digital Health
      • Educational Psychology
      • Cognitive & Neuro
      • Social & Personality
      • Arts Research
      • Sports & Movement
      • Marketing & Consumer Behavior
      • Economics
      • HCI / UX
      • Commercial / Industry Use
    • Labvanced Blog
  • Technology
    • Feature Overview
    • Desktop App
    • Phone App
    • Precise Timing
    • Experimental Control
    • Eye Tracking
    • Multi User Studies
    • More ...
      • Questionnaires
      • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Integration
      • Mouse Tracking
      • Data Privacy & Security
      • Text Transcription
  • Learn
    • Guide
    • Videos
    • Walkthroughs
    • FAQ
    • Release Notes
    • Documents
    • Classroom
  • Experiments
    • Cognitive Tests
    • Sample Studies
    • Public Experiment Library
  • Pricing
    • Pricing Overview
    • License Configurator
    • Single License
    • Research Group
    • Departments & Consortia
  • About
    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Downloads
    • Careers
    • Impressum
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy & Security
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Appgo to app icon
  • Logingo to app icon
Research
Publications
Tasks
Researcher Interviews
Use Cases
Labvanced Blog
  • 中國人
  • Deutsch
  • Français
  • Español
  • English
  • 日本語
Publications
Tasks
Researcher Interviews
Use Cases
Labvanced Blog
  • 中國人
  • Deutsch
  • Français
  • Español
  • English
  • 日本語
  • Publications
  • Tasks
  • Researcher Interviews
    • Comparing Online Webcam- and Laboratory-Based Eye-Tracking for the Assessment of Infant Audio-Visual Synchrony Perception
    • Finding Goldilocks Influencers- How Follower Count Drives Social Media Engagement
    • The semantic interference in 9- to 36-month old infants: An at-home eye-tracking study on infants' lexical abilities
    • Song Is More Memorable Than Speech Prosody - Discrete Pitches Aid Auditory Working Memory
    • Orthographic Relatedness and Transposed-word Effects in the Grammatical Decision Task
    • Emotion Modulation through Music after Sadness Induction
    • Children Learning Non-Adjacent Dependencies
    • Personality Hear in Noise
    • Are All Eyes the Same?
    • Verbal Priming in Infants
  • Use Cases
    • Research Areas

      • Developmental Psychology
      • Linguistics
      • Clinical & Digital Health
      • Educational Psychology
      • Cognitive & Neuro
      • Social & Personality Psychology
      • Arts, Music & Digital Media
      • Sports & Movement Psychology
      • Marketing & Consumer Behavior
      • Economics
      • HCI / UX
      • Commercial / Industry Use
    • Researchers

      • Students
      • Researchers
      • Groups
  • Blog
    • Generative AI in Educational Psychology Research
    • Best Practices for Webcam Eye Tracking Research with Infants and Toddlers
    • Types of Stimuli in Delay Discounting Tasks
    • Delay Discounting Task
    • Mindfulness-based Self-Efficacy Scale - Revised (MSES-R)
    • Team Dynamics and Research
    • Stroop Task | History, Task Description, Data and Psychology
    • BKB Sentence Test | Procedure & Research
    • Dyadic Effect in Psychology | Overview & Research
    • Navon Task: Task Setup, Research & More
    • Peer-reviewed Webcam Eye Tracking
    • Corsi Block-Tapping Test: From cubes to online design
    • Dot-Probe Task | Full Guide
    • Types of Memory: Concepts to Research
    • Ultimatum Game
    • The Visual Search Task
    • Attention Tasks in Psychology Research
    • Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7)
    • Decision Making Tasks in Psychology
    • The Obsessive Compulsive Inventory – Revised (OCI-R)
    • Assessing Executive Function Skills | Tasks & Batteries
    • The Flourishing Scale (FS) Questionnaire
    • Labvanced and the Spirit of Open Science
    • The Psychology of the Incubation Effect
    • The Bouba-Kiki Effect and Task
    • Lexical Decision Task: Accessing the Mental Lexicon
    • Image Description Task and Game with a Chatbox
    • Smooth Data Collection Process | 6 Tips for Research
    • Music Research with Labvanced
    • 7 Classic Cognitive Tasks & Examples
    • Mental Rotation Test | A Spatial Processing Task
    • XY Coordinates in Labvanced
    • 5 Famous Social Psychology Experiments
    • The Power of Remote & Infant-friendly ET
    • The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
    • 13 Head Tracking Use Cases for Research
    • 5 Tips for Improving Your Perception Skills
    • Introduction to the Preferential Looking Paradigm
    • Researching Cognition in Migraine & Headache Patients
    • The Landing Page - More Info Than You Think!
    • Headphone Checks - Then and Now
    • Sample Studies - Helpful Templates and Demos!
    • What Is Neuroplasticity?
    • 15 Famous Developmental Theories
    • Visual Attention and Eye Tracking
    • What Is Eye Tracking Technology?
    • Eye Tracking in Applied Linguistics Research
    • 10 Popular Linguistic Experiments
    • The Placebo Effect
    • 6 Key Concepts of Experimental Design
    • Conditioned Play Audiometry
    • Ebbinghaus Illusion
Trial preview from the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task

Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)

The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) is a neuropsychological task that evaluates cognitive flexibility, rule shifting, and executive control by having participants match cards according to changing sorting rules. It measures how efficiently a person can learn, adapt, and modify strategies when the environment changes. It is widely used in clinical, research, and applied performance settings.

Table of Contents

  • Task Format
  • Outcome Measures
  • Technology
  • Recommended Use
  • Customization

WCST Task Structure

In the WCST, participants see one card at the top of the screen and four cards displayed below it. Each card varies in colour, shape, and number of items. The participant’s task is to select the bottom card that matches the top card according to a hidden sorting rule. After each choice, feedback appears indicating whether the selection was correct or wrong. Participants must use this feedback to infer the current sorting rule. A short practice block is provided first, requiring ten consecutive correct responses. In the main task, the sorting rule can be based on colour, form, or the number of figures, and it can change at any time without warning. Participants must stay attentive, adapt quickly, and adjust their selections whenever the rule shifts. At the end of the task, participants also receive a brief results summary showing their total correct responses, overall errors, and a breakdown of perseverative and other error types.



Test it out!

Data Collected and Behavioral Metrics in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test

The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test generates a rich set of performance variables that capture how participants interpret feedback, adjust their strategies, and handle unexpected shifts in sorting rules. These metrics provide a comprehensive view of cognitive flexibility, problem solving, and sustained rule maintenance. In the Variables Tab, you will see all measures recorded during the WCST. Below are several of the most informative indicators that researchers frequently analyze in this version of the task.

These variables can be renamed, expanded, or supplemented with additional measures depending on your research needs.

Variable NameDescription
total_correctTotal number of correct responses across the trials
total_errorsTotal number of wrong responses across the trials
countPreserveErrorCount of errors where the participant continued using a previous rule despite feedback
countOtherErrorCount of incorrect responses that do not relate to the old rule, such as inconsistent choices or wrong guesses
RTReaction time for the trial
current_ruleName of the active sorting rule for the current trial (number, colour, or shape)

Data preview of behavioral measures and responses collected using the Wisconsin Card Sorting template.

Preview of the data collected using the online WCST task template in Labvanced showing trial level outputs from the WCST, including accuracy, chosen card features, perseverative and non-perseverative error counts, consecutive correct responses, and the active sorting rule for each trial.


Wisconsin Cart Sorting Test (WCST) Template

In this task, participants sort cards based on different rules. The rules will change during the task without being announced and the participant needs to figure out the new rules from feedback.



Technologies Supporting the WCST

The WCST benefits from several integrated technologies that strengthen data quality, support diverse testing situations, and allow researchers to scale their studies across devices and locations.

  • Millisecond Accurate Event Handling: Labvanced records responses and feedback timing with millisecond precision, making it possible to measure rapid shifts in decision making and the exact moment participants adapt to rule changes.

  • Integrated Webcam Based Eye Tracking: Researchers can optionally record gaze patterns using the built in webcam eye tracking solution, enabling analysis of how participants scan cards, search for relevant features, and visually explore rule possibilities without requiring specialized hardware.

  • Optimized Performance Across Devices: The WCST can be administered on desktops, laptops, and tablets using either mouse or touchscreen input. The platform automatically calibrates object placement and timing to ensure consistent performance on different screen sizes.

  • Desktop App for Lab-based Research: For lab based studies, the Labvanced Desktop App provides a stable testing environment (without the need of an internet connection) and the option to integrate hardware such as EEG and sensors via the Lab Streaming Layer, allowing synchronized multimodal data collection.

  • Remote Testing and Session Management: The task can be deployed to participants anywhere in the world, with built in session management, progress tracking, and secure data storage. This enables longitudinal WCST studies where cognitive changes can be monitored over multiple sessions.

  • Custom Event Logic and Real Time Monitoring: Labvanced allows researchers to embed conditional logic, adaptive rule changes, and automated scoring within the task itself. Real time video recording tools also make it possible to monitor participant progress during live sessions when needed.

A person looking at a webcam eye tracking task created with Labvanced during a trail making test task

Webcam Eye Tracking

Capture gaze patterns and visual attention with built-in, code-free and peer-reviewed webcam eye-tracking.

An icon of a clock symbolizing accurate reaction times from this trail making test template

Timing Precision

Capture reaction times, task performance, and more with millisecond accuracy for time-sensitive tasks.

An image of the desktop app of Labvanced used to modify the trail making test template

Desktop App

Run in-lab studies using the Desktop App, compatible with EEG and other LSL-connected lab hardware.

Applications and Target Populations | Recommended Use of the WCST

The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test is suitable for a wide range of populations and research goals. It is particularly valuable when studying conditions that affect executive function, cognitive flexibility, and rule guided behavior.

  • Neurological and Brain-Injury Populations: Commonly used in assessments involving frontal lobe dysfunction, traumatic brain injury, stroke, epilepsy, and neurodegenerative conditions, where impairments in set shifting and rule learning are often observed.

  • Psychiatric and Behavioral Health Groups: Relevant for studying executive functioning in conditions such as ADHD, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and mood-related disorders, providing insight into difficulties with adaptation, feedback use, and maintaining strategies.

  • Aging and related Conditions: Useful for monitoring age related changes in executive functioning and identifying early markers of cognitive decline in older adults.

  • Developmental and Educational Research: Appropriate for examining problem solving, strategy formation, and flexibility in children, adolescents, and emerging adults, especially when exploring cognitive maturation or learning patterns.

  • Occupational and High Performance Screening: Beneficial in fields such as aviation, emergency services, transportation, and other roles requiring rapid adaptation and decision making under shifting conditions.


Sign Up


Customizing the WCST Template

There are many ways to go about customizing this WCST task template. Below are a few themes researchers commonly ask when it comes to modifying this task.


Stimulus Set

Replace the default card images with your own color, shape, or symbolic stimuli using the ‘Object Properties’ panel.


Rule Structure and Difficulty Settings

Modify how often the sorting rule changes, adjust the number of consecutive correct responses required before a shift, or customize the order in which rules appear. The event system could be utilized to set up any presentation rule or level of difficulty.


Instruction and Training Modifications

Rewrite or expand the instruction screens to match the needs of children, clinical groups, or multilingual samples. You can also lengthen the practice phase, adjust feedback clarity, or incorporate comprehension checks, all by just clicking on the text object on frame.


Timing and Task Flow Adjustments

Change trial durations, fixation cue intervals, and feedback display times to suit your research design. These can be modified through ‘Delayed Action’ or frame specific timing controls. Frame navigation and progression can be modified by editing existing events or adding new ones by clicking on the ‘Add Frame Event’ under the events tab.


Integration With Other Modalities

Combine the WCST with wearable devices, eye tracking, or LSL compatible hardware using the Labvanced Desktop App. This allows synchronized multimodal data collection for more complex cognitive neuroscience studies.


If you need help customizing this task, please feel welcome to write to us and ask:


Contact Us

References

  • Berg, E. A. (1948). A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. Journal of General Psychology, 39, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1948.9918159

  • Miles, S., Howlett, C.A., Berryman, C. et al. Considerations for using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test to assess cognitive flexibility. Behav Res 53, 2083–2091 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01551-3