labvanced logoLabVanced
  • Research
    • Publications
    • Researcher Interviews
    • Use Cases
      • Developmental Psychology
      • Linguistics
      • Clinical & Digital Health
      • Educational Psychology
      • Cognitive & Neuro
      • Social & Personality
      • Arts Research
      • Sports & Movement
      • Marketing & Consumer Behavior
      • Economics
      • HCI / UX
      • Commercial / Industry Use
    • Labvanced Blog
    • Services
  • Technology
    • Feature Overview
    • Code-Free Study Building
    • Eye Tracking
    • Mouse Tracking
    • Generative AI Integration
    • Multi User Studies
    • More ...
      • Reaction Time/Precise Timing
      • Text Transcription
      • Heart Rate Detection (rPPG)
      • Emotion Detection
      • Questionnaires/Surveys
      • Experimental Control
      • Data Privacy & Security
      • Desktop App
      • Mobile App
  • Learn
    • Guide
    • Videos
    • Walkthroughs
    • FAQ
    • Release Notes
    • Documents
    • Classroom
  • Experiments
    • Cognitive Tests
    • Sample Studies
    • Public Experiment Library
  • Pricing
    • Licenses
    • Top-Up Recordings
    • Subject Recruitment
    • Study Building
    • Dedicated Support
    • Checkout
  • About
    • About Us
    • Contact
    • Downloads
    • Careers
    • Impressum
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy & Security
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Third-Party Licenses
  • Appgo to app icon
  • Logingo to app icon
Research
Publications
Tasks
Questionnaires & Scales
Methodology
Researcher Interviews
Use Cases
Labvanced Blog
Comparisons
Lab Notes
Services
  • 中國人
  • Deutsch
  • Français
  • Español
  • English
  • 日本語
Publications
Tasks
Questionnaires & Scales
Methodology
Researcher Interviews
Use Cases
Labvanced Blog
Comparisons
Lab Notes
Services
  • 中國人
  • Deutsch
  • Français
  • Español
  • English
  • 日本語
  • Publications
  • Tasks
  • Questionnaires & Scales
  • Methodology
  • Researcher Interviews
    • Comparing Online Webcam- and Laboratory-Based Eye-Tracking for the Assessment of Infant Audio-Visual Synchrony Perception
    • Finding Goldilocks Influencers- How Follower Count Drives Social Media Engagement
    • The semantic interference in 9- to 36-month old infants: An at-home eye-tracking study on infants' lexical abilities
    • Song Is More Memorable Than Speech Prosody - Discrete Pitches Aid Auditory Working Memory
    • Orthographic Relatedness and Transposed-word Effects in the Grammatical Decision Task
    • Emotion Modulation through Music after Sadness Induction
    • Children Learning Non-Adjacent Dependencies
    • Personality Hear in Noise
    • Are All Eyes the Same?
    • Verbal Priming in Infants
  • Use Cases
    • Research Areas

      • Developmental Psychology
      • Linguistics
      • Clinical & Digital Health
      • Educational Psychology
      • Cognitive & Neuro
      • Social & Personality Psychology
      • Arts, Music & Digital Media
      • Sports & Movement Psychology
      • Marketing & Consumer Behavior
      • Economics
      • HCI / UX
      • Commercial / Industry Use
    • Researchers

      • Students
      • Researchers
      • Groups
  • Blog
    • AI Can Predict Where You'll Look. It Still Doesn't Know What You'll Do.
    • MTurk Is Closing: 5 Alternatives for Recruiting Online Research Participants
    • Generative AI in Educational Psychology Research
    • Best Practices for Webcam Eye Tracking Research with Infants and Toddlers
    • Types of Stimuli in Delay Discounting Tasks
    • Delay Discounting Task
    • Mindfulness-based Self-Efficacy Scale - Revised (MSES-R)
    • Team Dynamics and Research
    • Stroop Task | History, Task Description, Data and Psychology
    • BKB Sentence Test | Procedure & Research
    • Dyadic Effect in Psychology | Overview & Research
    • Navon Task: Task Setup, Research & More
    • Peer-reviewed Webcam Eye Tracking
    • Corsi Block-Tapping Test: From cubes to online design
    • Dot-Probe Task | Full Guide
    • Types of Memory: Concepts to Research
    • Ultimatum Game
    • The Visual Search Task
    • Attention Tasks in Psychology Research
    • Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7)
    • Decision Making Tasks in Psychology
    • The Obsessive Compulsive Inventory – Revised (OCI-R)
    • Assessing Executive Function Skills | Tasks & Batteries
    • The Flourishing Scale (FS) Questionnaire
    • Labvanced and the Spirit of Open Science
    • The Psychology of the Incubation Effect
    • The Bouba-Kiki Effect and Task
    • Lexical Decision Task: Accessing the Mental Lexicon
    • Image Description Task and Game with a Chatbox
    • Smooth Data Collection Process | 6 Tips for Research
    • Music Research with Labvanced
    • 7 Classic Cognitive Tasks & Examples
    • Mental Rotation Test | A Spatial Processing Task
    • XY Coordinates in Labvanced
    • 5 Famous Social Psychology Experiments
    • The Power of Remote & Infant-friendly ET
    • Wisconsin Card Sorting Test | History & Research
    • 13 Head Tracking Use Cases for Research
    • 5 Tips for Improving Your Perception Skills
    • Introduction to the Preferential Looking Paradigm
    • Researching Cognition in Migraine & Headache Patients
    • The Landing Page - More Info Than You Think!
    • Headphone Checks - Then and Now
    • Sample Studies - Helpful Templates and Demos!
    • What Is Neuroplasticity?
    • 15 Famous Developmental Theories
    • Visual Attention and Eye Tracking
    • What Is Eye Tracking Technology?
    • Eye Tracking in Applied Linguistics Research
    • 10 Popular Linguistic Experiments
    • The Placebo Effect
    • 6 Key Concepts of Experimental Design
    • Conditioned Play Audiometry
    • Ebbinghaus Illusion
  • Comparisons
  • Lab Notes
    • Webcam Eye Tracking 2.0
    • Fixation Detection Analysis (coming soon)
  • Services
    • Overview
    • Joint Grant Applications
    • Subject Recruitment
    • Study Building
    • Dedicated Support
    • License Comparison
Tower of London Test trial preview implemented in Labvanced.

Tower of London Test

The Tower of London Test is a classic measure of planning and executive function in which participants move colored balls across three pegs, one at a time, to recreate a target arrangement shown alongside the board. Originally developed by Shallice (1982) to study prefrontal lobe function, it remains one of the most widely used tasks for measuring forward planning and problem-solving in cognitive, clinical, and developmental research. Labvanced's digital Tower of London Test implements the standardized 12-problem set published by Krikorian et al. (1994), automatically scoring each trial against its known minimum-move solution and recording detailed move and timing data for both online and in-lab use.

Table of Contents

  • Task Format
  • Data Collected
  • Technology
  • Customization
  • Recommended Use

Task Format | Tower of London Test Online & In-Lab

In the Tower of London Test, participants see a board with three pegs of different heights holding three colored balls, alongside a goal arrangement showing where those balls need to end up. Participants solve each problem by clicking a ball to select it, then clicking the peg to move it to, one move at a time, until the board matches the goal. Each of the 12 problems has a known minimum number of moves required to solve it, shown on screen before the participant begins, ranging from 2 moves on the easiest problems to 5 moves on the hardest. A move that isn't legal, selecting a ball that isn't on top of its peg, or trying to place a ball on a peg that's already full, doesn't count as a move and is recorded separately as an illegal move attempt. Each problem is administered once, with no retries if it isn't solved in the minimum number of moves (the TOL-F single-attempt model).


Test it out!

Desktop Version

On desktop, participants move balls with the mouse: clicking a ball selects it, and clicking a peg moves the selected ball there. A brief instruction and training phase precedes the 12 scored problems.


Mobile Version

The mobile version uses the same tap-to-select, tap-to-move interaction, on a touchscreen-sized board. The problem set, scoring, and single-attempt structure are otherwise identical across devices.

Tower of London Test Metrics and Data Collected

The Tower of London Test captures a range of behavioral measurements that reveal how participants plan and execute a sequence of moves toward a goal. The variables recorded help researchers measure accuracy against the optimal solution, planning time separately from execution time, and move efficiency. All variables can be viewed and customized within the task's Variables Tab.

Below are the most task-specific variables researchers commonly analyze in this version of the task:

Variable NameDescription
trial_outcomeThis trial's result: Correct, Incorrect, timeout, or pending
move_countNumber of moves made in the current trial
min_movesThe minimum number of moves required to solve the current problem
total_correctTotal trials solved in the minimum number of moves, the primary TOL-F outcome measure
ITTInitial Thinking Time: the time from stimulus onset to the first ball selected
METMovement Execution Time: the time from the first ball selected to trial completion
illegal_move_attemptsInvalid move attempts (a full peg, or a non-topmost ball selected) in the current trial
current_goalThe target ball arrangement for the current trial

Data preview of trial-level behavioral measures and responses collected using the Tower of London Test template for online research, including the goal arrangement, initial thinking time, movement execution time, move count, and trial outcome.
Data table showing individual trial level outputs from the online Tower of London Test in Labvanced.

Tower of London Test

This study measures planning and executive function using the Tower of London Test. Participants rearrange colored balls across three pegs to match a target configuration in as few moves as possible. Initial thinking time, movement execution time, move count, and accuracy against the optimal solution are captured as performance indicators.



Technology Driving the Tower of London Test for Online & In-Lab Research

The Tower of London Test depends on precise stimulus timing, accurate move-by-move logging, and reliable response recording to separate planning time from execution time. Labvanced provides tools that allow researchers to reliably measure executive function across devices and settings.

  • High Precision Timing for Stimulus and Response: Initial Thinking Time and Movement Execution Time both depend on accurate timestamping of the first and final moves in a trial. Labvanced supports millisecond level timing for stimulus onset and response logging, ensuring reliable measurement across trials.

  • Desktop App Mode for Controlled Experiments: For in-lab or clinical administration requiring stable timing or integration with external systems, the task can be run through the Labvanced desktop app, supporting compatibility with EEG or other LSL based setups commonly used in neuropsychological research.

  • Code-Free Customization of Problems and Logic: The problem set, minimum-move thresholds, and single-attempt scoring logic are all configured through Labvanced's visual editor, allowing researchers to adjust the task without writing code.

An icon of a clock symbolizing accurate reaction times from this Tower of London Test template

Timing Precision

Capture reaction times, task performance, and more with millisecond accuracy for time-sensitive tasks.

An image of the desktop app of Labvanced used to modify the Tower of London Test template

Desktop App

Run in-lab studies using the Desktop App, compatible with EEG and other LSL-connected lab hardware.

An icon representing Labvanced's code-free experiment builder used to modify the Tower of London Test template

Code-free Editor

Build and adapt tasks visually, without writing code, using Labvanced's drag-and-drop experiment builder.

Customization of the Tower of London Test

There are many ways to adapt this Tower of London Test template depending on research goals. Below are several customization themes researchers commonly explore when modifying this task.


Problem Set and Minimum-Move Thresholds

The 12 problems, each problem's minimum-move solution, and the goal ball arrangement are all defined in the task's stimulus data frame and can be edited directly in the Trials & Conditions panel. Researchers can substitute their own problem set or adjust the minimum-move threshold used for scoring.


Illegal Move Handling

What counts as an illegal move attempt, selecting a ball that isn't topmost, or targeting a full peg, is configured through the task's event logic and can be adjusted or removed depending on how strictly a study needs to enforce standard administration rules.


Timing and Feedback

Presentation timing for the goal arrangement and feedback shown after each trial can be adjusted by editing frame durations or the Set Object Property actions that control feedback text, or removed entirely for researchers who prefer a no-feedback administration closer to standardized clinical protocols.


If you need help customizing this task, please feel welcome to write to us and ask:


Contact Us

Recommended Use and Applications of the Tower of London Test

The Tower of London Test is a foundational measure of planning and executive function, widely used across cognitive, clinical, and developmental research as well as standardized neuropsychological assessment.

  • Executive Function and Planning Research: Originally developed to study the planning deficits associated with prefrontal lobe damage, and widely used since to study forward planning, problem-solving, and means-end reasoning (Shallice, 1982).

  • Clinical and Neuropsychological Assessment: Applied in neuropsychological batteries to assess executive dysfunction, using the standardized 12-problem set and normative data established by Krikorian et al. (1994).

  • Developmental Research: Used to study how planning ability develops across childhood and adolescence, with performance on the Tower of London improving markedly between the ages of 6 and 13 (Injoque-Ricle et al., 2014).


Sign Up


References

  • Injoque-Ricle, I., Barreyro, J. P., Calero, A., & Burin, D. I. (2014). Tower of London: Planning development in children from 6 to 13 years of age. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, Article e77. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2014.83

  • Krikorian, R., Bartok, J., & Gay, N. (1994). Tower of London procedure: A standard method and developmental data. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16(6), 840-850. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639408402697

  • Shallice, T. (1982). Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 298(1089), 199-209. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1982.0082

Related Tasks

The Tower of London Test pairs naturally with other executive function tasks in Labvanced's task library.

Trail Making Test

In Part A, the participant connects numbers in ascending order (1-2-3...) while in Part B, numbers and letters alternate (1-A-2-B...), in this classic task for measuring cognitive flexibility.

Corsi Block Tapping Test

Blocks flash sequentially on screen. Participants must repeat the sequence by clicking the blocks in the exact order shown.